Take a look at this Iowa Supreme Court decision from 2022, and see if the interpretation of "order" would be different under Schedule III.
State v. Middlekauff, 974 N.W.2d 781, 800 (Iowa 2022) (“We conclude that marijuana cannot be validly prescribed or ordered for medical treatment under Iowa Code section 124.401(5).”)
And, Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), state decides what conditions a prescription can be used for.
Appreciate your post of the statutes because so many people are always just making guesstimate and ( right now at least the Government has to follow) so the road continues to what we had before Nixon put it in schedule 1
good shit, guys.
Take a look at this Iowa Supreme Court decision from 2022, and see if the interpretation of "order" would be different under Schedule III.
State v. Middlekauff, 974 N.W.2d 781, 800 (Iowa 2022) (“We conclude that marijuana cannot be validly prescribed or ordered for medical treatment under Iowa Code section 124.401(5).”)
And, Gonzales v. Oregon, 546 U.S. 243 (2006), state decides what conditions a prescription can be used for.
Doesn't the government allow importation of all kinds of pharmaceuticals (even unapproved ones) from Canada to states that allow it?
How will this affect urine testing in medical settings? Such as routine drug testings during pregnancy?
You mean, will they still punish people for endangering the unborn by using non-prescription drugs intentionally?
Probably still gonna be up to states.
Yes.
Appreciate your post of the statutes because so many people are always just making guesstimate and ( right now at least the Government has to follow) so the road continues to what we had before Nixon put it in schedule 1