Casey Hardison here. I’ve been working on Cognitive Liberty and the unnatural severance of the class “drugs” by CSA and related laws and regulations giving rise to arbitrary, unfair, irrational law, which by definition violates equal protection.
See definition controlled drug in fed CSA, compare with Wyoming s35-7-1011(e). One excludes Alcohol and Tobacco from definition “controlled drug.” Wyoming excludes alcohol and tobacco from the “authority to control.”
This is Justice Jackson’s applying one law to the masses the legislature did not want to apply to itself so as to escape political retribution if larger numbers were affected. CSA and similar are prohibited “special law.” Railway Express 336 US 106, 112.
Great stuff Matt. Are you expecting a draft of the new “Cole/Garland” memo alongside DEA’s response in the proposed rules, or a less comprehensive memo just focusing on the rescheduling? Seems to me that Milgram/Garland would want to frame the proposed rules comprehensively and touch on what this means for both medical and recreational markets and any federal enforcement that is at odds with states laws on cannabis. For example, interstate movements, banking, capital markets, etc. Thoughts?
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/pw3rfs9gm6lg80ij9tja6/2023-01171-Supplemental-Release-1.pdf?rlkey=v5atj0tcnhxhnszyyzcwdcvvt&dl=0
Great job!!!
Thank you, Matt!
Casey Hardison here. I’ve been working on Cognitive Liberty and the unnatural severance of the class “drugs” by CSA and related laws and regulations giving rise to arbitrary, unfair, irrational law, which by definition violates equal protection.
See definition controlled drug in fed CSA, compare with Wyoming s35-7-1011(e). One excludes Alcohol and Tobacco from definition “controlled drug.” Wyoming excludes alcohol and tobacco from the “authority to control.”
This is Justice Jackson’s applying one law to the masses the legislature did not want to apply to itself so as to escape political retribution if larger numbers were affected. CSA and similar are prohibited “special law.” Railway Express 336 US 106, 112.
And the rest follows! Let’s work together!
-fiat lux!
Cx
Thank You
Good Work!
Great stuff Matt. Are you expecting a draft of the new “Cole/Garland” memo alongside DEA’s response in the proposed rules, or a less comprehensive memo just focusing on the rescheduling? Seems to me that Milgram/Garland would want to frame the proposed rules comprehensively and touch on what this means for both medical and recreational markets and any federal enforcement that is at odds with states laws on cannabis. For example, interstate movements, banking, capital markets, etc. Thoughts?
Fantastic work.
So ... does this mean it’s legal federally now .. 🤷♀️
"This naturally invites the question: imagine if the cannabis industry organized/backed this type of work? No..."
I am not sure how legal and science professionals survive in the industry...
You are my HERO!
OUR HERO
i’ll think i’ll have this framed
You da man 💥 Thank you
Hell, yeah!