So if the USG is taking the position that our domestic drug policy doesn't affect international commerce, can we overturn Wickard v. Filburn based on the same logic as between the States?
I like her comments at ~2.21.45 where she says “ Vital importance of enhancing access to treatment including medication assisted treatment……assuring access to control medications for medical and scientific purposes.”
It is about time we heard the focus on constitutional limitations and domestic law. That exception is in all three drug treaties and should be cover aplenty for domestic policy.
So if the USG is taking the position that our domestic drug policy doesn't affect international commerce, can we overturn Wickard v. Filburn based on the same logic as between the States?
Obviously :)
Excellent, thanks for sharing…
I like her comments at ~2.21.45 where she says “ Vital importance of enhancing access to treatment including medication assisted treatment……assuring access to control medications for medical and scientific purposes.”
Lane
It is about time we heard the focus on constitutional limitations and domestic law. That exception is in all three drug treaties and should be cover aplenty for domestic policy.